Election 2019

4 things you need to know from Pennsylvania’s only 2018 governor debate

The person who was booed. Who is Alex Trebek?

Alex Trebek with the candidates

Alex Trebek with the candidates

Sarah Anne Hughes / The Incline
Sarah Anne Hughes

HERSHEY — With just one gubernatorial debate scheduled before the Nov. 6 election, Pennsylvania voters needed a moderator who would ask substantive questions, control the candidates, and move the conversation forward in what’s been a sleepy race thus far.

But that’s not what they got Monday night at a disjointed thought at-times entertaining debate between Gov. Tom Wolf and Republican former state Sen. Scott Wagner in Hershey at the Pennsylvania Chamber’s annual dinner.

Below are four takeaways from the one and only gubernatorial debate.

No. 1: Alex Trebek probably wasn’t the best choice of moderator.

The “Jeopardy!” host sure was charming as the special guest at the Pennsylvania Chamber dinner. And he definitely prepared. “This is not a game show tonight. This is serious stuff,” Trebek correctly said, adding that he’d experienced “agony” and “stress” getting ready.

But as a moderator, Trebek tended toward telling stories about himself rather than asking the candidates actual questions.

He was even booed toward the end of the debate after asking a question about a proposed severance tax.

No. 2: Scott Wagner continues to have thoughts on public sector unions.

When the candidates were asked questions, Wagner responded several times with criticisms of public sector unions. Trebek asked the Republican if the state GOP essentially dropped the ball by allowing so many Democrats to get elected to the state Supreme Court. Wagner responded that the Democrats had public sector union money. He also claimed that Wolf vetoed a pension reform bill because of unions. (Wolf provided other reasons.)

Wagner once infamously compared unions to Hitler.

No. 3: Tom Wolf and Wagner can agree.

The candidates found plenty of things to disagree about, like the death penalty (Wolf, citing a bipartisan commission is opposed; Wagner wants it to be mandatory for certain heinous crimes).

But the two men agreed about money in politics (it’s bad) and said open primaries would be good for Pennsylvania.

Still, Trebek couldn’t help but add his opinion, warning Wagner that an open primary system may have favored a more moderate candidate.

No. 4: Trebek can bring people together.

The host did do one thing. He got Pennsylvania Democrats and Republicans to agree that he didn’t do a great job.

Want some more? Explore other Election 2019 stories.

We love you, Pittsburgh.

Looks like you’re the type of person who reads to the end of articles.

Because you love learning about Pittsburgh, you need our free morning newsletter, full of useful news, can’t-miss events, and everything else you need to know about our city.

It feels like we know each other.

It’s nice seeing you here, because we can’t do this without you.

Make our relevant, original, and actionable journalism possible by contributing now.

Let’s make it official.

Your support allows us to do great work like the article you just read, and we can’t do it without you.

Will you become a member today to help us for the long haul?

You’re the best.

Members often ask us how they can go the extra mile to help us. Your financial support makes this possible. Bringing your friends makes it fun.

Get your loved ones to sign up for our daily newsletter today.